[ARC5] CW/MCW
tom at telmore.com
tom at telmore.com
Mon Nov 11 18:40:27 EST 2013
I remember when I moved to Alaska in 1992 I spent my first couple of years doing engineering work for public radio stations. I was out in McGrath, Ak. in the summer of 93 at the backup transmitter site shared by the FAA. There was a single tower fed by a diplexer that had a low frequency NDB on 350 Khz and the public radio station, KSKO on 870 Khz. connected to the same tower. I noticed off in the woods the remnants of other towers and after a short walk around the perimeter I realized that there were a total of 4 of them of that had been cut with a torched and left were they had fallen over. This had been a 4 course radio range site at one time and must have something to see in it's day.
-Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Knoppow [mailto:1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 02:23 PM
To: W9RAN at oneradio.net, arc5 at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [ARC5] CW/MCW
-----Original Message----->From: Robert Nickels >Sent: Nov 11, 2013 2:03 PM>To: arc5 at mailman.qth.net>Subject: Re: [ARC5] CW/MCW>>On 11/11/2013 3:11 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:>> The filter people are thinking of was used with aircraft radio range stations.>>A few years ago when I was researching the Heath HT-4 light aircraft >transmitter, I came across this excellent video showing a modern-day >reconstruction of a four-course radio range:>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-VqtNY8vpw>>Of course all the original ranges are long gone, so this is really the >only chance many of us will have to see and hear what it was like and >how it worked. The value of these filters will be easily apparent >;-) This model radio range operates on 28 MHz.>>Sorry for the redundancy to those who are already aware of this video, >but I thought it was worth passing along again.>>73, Bob W9RAN A google search for Adcock radio range will find a lot of stuff on the old range stations. They were really very clever but had problems due to skywave and the difficulty in determining exactly which beam one was on. Some stations had additional VHF markers to identify courses. Also, there was no signal directly over the station, this was called the zone of silence and eventually another VHF marker was added to identify it. Without the marker a pilot might think he was directly over the station when actually he was in some dead spot. Courses became reciprocal when passing the station but in bad weather it might be difficult to determine that. ______________________________________________________________ARC5 mailing listHome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.netThis list hosted by: http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the ARC5
mailing list