[ARC5] Visual alignment of BC-454
mstangelo at comcast.net
mstangelo at comcast.net
Fri May 24 13:47:27 EDT 2013
Jay,
Could they have been EXAR function generators? Unlike Signetics and National they're still in business:
<http://www.exar.com/communications/timing/voltage-controlled-oscillator-vco/xr2209>
Mike N2MS
----- Original Message -----
From: Jay Coward <jcoward5452 at aol.com>
To: kgordon2006 at frontier.com, dennis monticelli <dennis.monticelli at gmail.com>
Cc: Arc5 at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thu, 23 May 2013 23:20:05 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [ARC5] Visual alignment of BC-454
There were some function generator chips back in the eight's I used for ramp and pulse generation Can't remember the manufactuer but may have been Signetics and National semi. I would use these to make a voltage ramp for an analog voltage to current driver for YIG microwave oscillators to make "cheap" swept signal sources for production line use at Avantek, I would set up a 0-10V ramp with a very short fall time. the simultanious pulse out was available and the short downward pulse I would offset to give a negative -3V pulse which I fed to the scope's Z input and that would blank the scope's retrace.
These chips are pretty handy and one could easily breadboard into a handy bit of test gear.
My $.02, YMMV. etc.
Jay KE6PPF
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com>
To: Dennis Monticelli <dennis.monticelli at gmail.com>
Cc: Arc5 <Arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thu, May 23, 2013 12:51 pm
Subject: Re: [ARC5] Visual alignment of BC-454
On 23 May 2013 at 9:36, Dennis Monticelli wrote:
> Ken,
>
> To be more clear: The asymmetry to which I was referring was the the
> freqeuency hump in the passband, not the asymmetry of the retrace.
Yes. I figured that out, thanks.
> Ian is right in stating that the retrace should look like a mirror
> image of the forward trace. Something is going non-linear during the
> retrace. I think that is a separate issue from the passband hump.
Well, IMHO, IFF the sweep is REALLY a ramp or true sawtooth, rather than
a triangle, the retrace should show essentially a very weak straight line.
A triangle wave or a sine wave would show two traces, one the mirror-image
of the other.
My sweep output is almost a ramp. The return-to-zero end is NOT a vertical
line. It a quite finite, and then some, return to zero.
And the ramp itself is not straight either. In fact, the slower the sweeps, the
more curved the ramp actually is.
As I said, in order to get what is really there, I need a much better
ramp-generator...one with almost instant return-to-zero, and with a truly
linear ramp.
I am investigating various circuit diagrams.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list