[ARC5] Radios and the Canal - Hammarlunds
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Fri May 17 11:42:17 EDT 2013
> I had a HQ145X and when I got it it drifted so much it was really
> useless for CW or SSB and almost useless for AM! I found that the HFO
> was the drifting part but the tube tested good. I subbed in several
> others I had and the VFO settled right down!
Yes. Hammarlund used the 6C4 HFO in almost all of their models after the
HQ-129X.
My HQ-110C drifted like mad until I subbed a few 6C4WAs and finally some
of the military ruggedized versions that had a number like "6139" or
something. Then it settled right down. I also subbed the 6BE6 first mixer tube
for a mil version, and THAT helped too.
Concerning the earlier versions: I had a brand new BC-779 back in the day.
It drifted quite a bit until it was well warmed up.
Like Todd mentioned, the manual flatly states that it needs to be well
warmed up. I never turned mine off in fact, and had it mounted in a rack.
As I have mentioned before, I added a triode product detector to it and used
it extensively for several years for RTTY on 20 meters and below.
On 20 meters, when listening to a weak steady carrier, it drifted
back-and-forth a few cycles all the time. It was actually very pleasant to hear
and never interefered with reception.
Hammarlund brought out a service bulletin after WWII sometime, I don't
know the date: that was a factory recommendation that one add a 3 pfd
N-750 temperature compensating capacitor to the HFO capacitor which
would drop the warm-up drift to very low. I never did that though.
Maybe when I restore one of the three BC-779s I have here, I'll try it.
Adding a BC-453 "Q-5er" makes those receivers really handy for CW and
RTTY, BTW.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list