[ARC5] Hallicrafters receivers.

Kenneth G. Gordon kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Mon May 13 12:23:25 EDT 2013


On 13 May 2013 at 15:06, Fuqua, Bill L wrote:

>   They really packed as much as possible into the SX-100 cabinet. The
> microphonics were really bad.

Yes. One of my Elmers, Don R. Anderson, had one. I was very disappointed 
in it at the time. It was brand new then.

> I upgraded from my HQ-129X to a SX-101A,
> in the 60's. Now, that was  a sturdy, heavy and stable receiver.
> Product detector as well. 73 Bill wa4lav

Although I have never used one of those, I have heard that they were pretty 
good.

The SX-117 and SX-115 was also, apparently, very stable.

But as far as I am concerned, those were exceptions to the generality of Halli 
receivers.

The HQ-129X would have been my choice even over the SX-101 I think.

At least one can hang a BC-453 on one. ;-)

Ken W7EKB


More information about the ARC5 mailing list