[ARC5] 10 meter BC-454 a bit more
Dennis Monticelli
dennis.monticelli at gmail.com
Thu Mar 7 12:16:50 EST 2013
I was not aware that Stoddard had done it. It's certainly not a technique
that lends itself well to low maintenance of equipment. As soon as the
emission fell, the gain would be immediately affected.
As for lowering the B+, I could see that affecting partition noise, but not
anything happening around the cathode.
Dennis AE6C
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:53 AM, David Stinson <arc5 at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Monticelli" <
> dennis.monticelli at gmail.com>
>
> ....If the tube is strong (has plenty of reserve emission)
>> it should be possible to cut back its cathode temp without adversely
>> impacting gain and improve the noise figure through Johnson noise
>> reduction. Has anybody heard of this being tried?
>>
>
> Isn't this the way Stoddard did it with their DFing and noise-sampling
> equipment?
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list