[ARC5] DF-ing.
Jim Wiley
jwiley at gci.net
Wed Jul 3 13:08:04 EDT 2013
In general terms, adding a "sense" antenna to a loop changes the
response from a "figure-8" to a "cardioid" pattern. The depth of the
null in the cardioid is dependent primarily on the balance of signal
delivered to the receiver from each antenna. If the signals are
precisely of the same strength, then a good cardioid with a sharp null
will and a broad peak 180 degrees from the single null be the result.
However, if the balance is not correct, the depth of the null will
suffer. The usage of the DF antenna thus changes from one where a
relatively sharp null is the desired response, even though that null is
bidirectional, to one where the antenna can be used to look for a much
broader "peak", or signal maximum.
Optimum DF capability comes from using both patterns, using the peaking
pattern to determine the general direction of the signal, and the
figure-8 null to get a more precise determination of the exact
direction. All this assumes only one antenna, either a loop or a loop
plus sense antenna is used. If a more complex antenna is used, then
different techniques are possible.
At VHF and UHF frequencies, a 4-element square array of monopoles or
dipoles is small enough to fit on a vehicle roof.or short mast. Such
antennas are electronically rotated at high speed, and can give 1-degree
resolution of the direction of the incoming signal, less any ambiguities
caused by reception of signals from reflected from other objects. Using
such a system in a moving vehicle tends to make it possible to determine
the "true" direction by averaging out the error signals, sort of like
separating wheat from chaff.
Other techniques can be used to give reasonably precise bearings at HF,
for example by using crossed ferrite core loop antennas and an
electronic driving signal to create the effect of the 4-dipole array
used at VHF. An example is the common ADF found in many light aircraft
- or at least once common - it is being obsoleted by GPS. Up in these
parts, most pilots I know (meaning the ones still alive) insist on
retaining the ADF in their aircraft. The time honored "belt and
suspenders" approach.
- Jim, KL7CC
On 7/3/2013 8:35 AM, Kenneth G. Gordon wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2013 at 7:25, J. Forster wrote:
>
>> My understanding of the pattern of a loop alone in free space is a
>> figure-8 with both nulls in the plane of the loop.
> Correct.
>
>> Adding in the sense antenna, degrades one of those nulls, (and
>> possibly improves the depth of the other) by adding in a roughly
>> omnidirectional signal.
> Yes, to both statements.
>
> However, as Mike points out, there are many, many factors that can degrade
> that null.
>
> Supposedly, the "perfect" result of adding a properly-phased signal from the
> "sense" antenna is to completely eliminate one null of the figure-8, and at the
> same time, enhance the other one, i.e., making it deeper and sharper.
>
> However, actually achieving that "perfect" result is practically impossible in
> normal use. Most of the time we have to settle for "good enough". And
> sometimes, given external factors, that "good enough", isn't.
>
> Ken W7EKB
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list