[ARC5] Oddball RAX Receiver

[hwhall at compuserve.com]

AH! Got it. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Hanz <aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org>
To: hwhall <hwhall at compuserve.com>
Cc: arc5 <arc5 at ix.netcom.com>; arc5 <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>; ARC-5radio <ARC-5radio at yahoogroups.com>; milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wed, Aug 28, 2013 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: [ARC5] Oddball RAX Receiver

 
 
 
Read AB5S' correction eight minutes later to PB4Y-2, Wayne.  It is *not*  
a Catalina - it's a Privateer. 
 
On 8/28/2013 6:00 PM, hwhall at compuserve.com wrote: 
> But weren't the Catalinas PBY-4, PBY-5, etc., instead of PB4-Y? 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: David Stinson <arc5 at ix.netcom.com> 
> To: ARC-5 List <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>; ARC-5 Yahoo <ARC-5radio at yahoogroups.com>;  
milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> 
> Sent: Tue, Aug 27, 2013 10:59 pm 
>> 
>> OOPS 
>> I mean: 
>>>     MODIFIED FOR OPERATIONAL 
>>>        FLIGHT TRAINING PB4Y-2 
>>>         DO NOT INSTALL  IN AIRPLANE  
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: David Stinson <arc5 at ix.netcom.com> 
> To: ARC-5 List <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>; ARC-5 Yahoo <ARC-5radio at yahoogroups.com>;  
milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> 
> Sent: Tue, Aug 27, 2013 10:51 pm 
>    
>   Thanks to everyone who took a look at this. 
> The consensus looks to be: 
>    
>       MODIFIED FOR OPERATIONAL 
>          FLIGHT TRAINING PB4-Y 
>           DO NOT INSTALL 
>             IN AIRPLANE 
>    
> We do know that the PB4-Y used the RAX / ART-13 
> in the Laision role, so this would made sense. 
>    
> Thanks again! 
> 73 Dave AB5S