[ARC5] Receiver input impedance.
WA5CAB at cs.com
WA5CAB at cs.com
Wed Oct 31 02:01:52 EDT 2012
This is I think at least the second post to say that the antenna post on
the Command Sets is connected to the tank circuit (antenna coil in parallel
with one section of the tuning capacitor) by the front panel mounted trimmer
capacitor. But it isn't. The trimmer capacitor is in parallel with the tank
circuit, one side of all three components going to chassis. The antenna
post connects to the three parallel components through a fixed 8.5 mmf ceramic
capacitor (at least in the BC-453-(*) ). And that point is also connected
to a fixed 100 mmf capacitor which connects to the 12SK7 grid and the 2 meg
grid leak resistor.
So the imput impedance is about 2 meg plus the reactance of the two series
fixed capacitors, less any MFP leakage.
In a message dated 10/31/2012 00:20:28 AM Central Daylight Time,
vk2bcu at operamail.com writes:
> Looking at the circuit for the BC-946 (similar to R23 etc) I see the
> tank circuit is connected to the antenna (or the aerial if you live in
> Australia) by a trimmer cap. According to the theory (and working in
> the ideal) the impedance of a parallel tank circuit at resonance is
> very high (infinite, for the idealist) and so the advantage in matching
> an antenna to THIS load comes from stepping-up Z from 50 ohms to a
> higher Z. However, if the loop is also tuned to resonance, it will have
> a similar high impedance (infinite for the idealist) and so there is no
> need for a matching device.
>
> This is why the signal "peaks" when the trimmer is adjusted.
>
> That's my "teary" of how "de aerial" woiks.
>
>
Robert Downs - Houston
wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
More information about the ARC5
mailing list