[ARC5] ARC-5 Audio Comparison, Stock vs. "CQ-VooDoo"

[Jay Coward]

 Isn't that mod in the CQ  surplus conversion handbook including Command Sets? My first BC-348 I got as a chassis and it had a 6F6 added ahead of the output tube. It was built on a copper plate (for improved fidelity) and mounted over the dynamotor well. After getting the radio working, I took out the added stage and did not really notice much difference. 
 The set is a BC-348-C modified to S. I got it in 1979 for $20, I still have it and use it regularly.
 Jay KE6PPF



-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com>
To: ARC-5 List <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sun, Oct 21, 2012 10:33 am
Subject: Re: [ARC5] ARC-5 Audio Comparison, Stock vs. "CQ-VooDoo"


On 21 Oct 2012 at 10:25, mac wrote:
> Gosh,  Dave does have a sense of humor...  :^)
Yes. Doesn't he, just? ;-)
I had a terrible time making out WWV under all the distortion and noise. Did 
ou? There was quite a bit more than I expected. Perhaps it is just my 
ncient, 70 year old, ears...
I'd still like to find that CQ article he mentioned...
Kenneth G. Gordon W7EKB
"Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway."--- John   Wayne
______________________________________________________________
RC5 mailing list
ome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
elp: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
ost: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
lease help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html