[ARC5] "Conversion" or "Perversion" articles?
Geoff
geoffrey at jeremy.mv.com
Sat Oct 20 16:09:03 EDT 2012
Hiding in plain site Johnny boy. Since this is one of the few forums
remaining open to you Id of thought you would want to deny all those rumors
instead of limp wristed responses.
Oh and we met at the MIT Flea a few times, you certainly live up to your
reputation.........
----- Original Message -----
From: "J. Forster" <jfor at quikus.com>
To: "Geoff" <geoffrey at jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: "Dennis DuVall" <scr522 at earthlink.net>; "ARC-5 Mail List"
<arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ARC5] "Conversion" or "Perversion" articles?
> How about a photo of your head, so everybody knows what a cheese Danish
> looks like.
>
> And, I don't HAVE to hide behind an alias.
>
> -John
>
> ==========
>
>
>> What a loser.
>> How about some photos of your living room John?
>> Id like to see how a know it all lives...
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "J. Forster" <jfor at quikus.com>
>> To: "Geoff" <geoffrey at jeremy.mv.com>
>> Cc: "Dennis DuVall" <scr522 at earthlink.net>; "ARC-5 Mail List"
>> <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 2:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ARC5] "Conversion" or "Perversion" articles?
>>
>>
>>> Go stuff it Carl.
>>>
>>> If you can't see the analogy, stop looking up your own butt.
>>>
>>> -John
>>>
>>> ==========
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I love how you bastardize a USN PA system with Army receivers.
>>>> Another Doofus award to our non ham junior member self appointed
>>>> expert.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe because they had to be heard above engine or tracked vehicle
>>>>> noise
>>>>> or gunfire?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about you, but my living room has neither of those. I
>>>>> don't
>>>>> need the kind of sound level that a 1MC produces.
>>>>>
>>>>> -John
>>>>>
>>>>> =========
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that the BC-312/342 receivers were intended to be used with a
>>>>>> loudspeaker and the (Doofuss?) designers included an additional audio
>>>>>> stage between the second detector and the 6F6 audio output tube.
>>>>>> Gross waste of scarce wartime resources maybe?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dennis D. W7QHO
>>>>>> Glendale, CA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ****************
>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Mike Everette wrote (in part):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I never, ever had a problem with audio from a Command receiver,
>>>>>>> SCR-522, BC-348 or BC-312/342
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>> ARC5 mailing list
>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>> ARC5 mailing list
>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>
>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5343 - Release Date:
>>>>> 10/20/12
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5343 - Release Date: 10/20/12
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5343 - Release Date: 10/20/12
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list