[ARC5] "Conversion" or "Perversion" articles?

[Geoff]

I love how you bastardize a USN PA system with Army receivers.
Another Doofus award to our non ham junior member  self appointed expert.
 


> Maybe because they had to be heard above engine or tracked vehicle noise
> or gunfire?
> 
> I don't know about you, but my living room has neither of those. I don't
> need the kind of sound level that a 1MC produces.
> 
> -John
> 
> =========
> 
> 
> 
>> Note that the BC-312/342 receivers were intended to be used with a
>> loudspeaker and the (Doofuss?) designers included an additional audio
>> stage between the second detector and the 6F6 audio output tube.
>> Gross waste of scarce wartime resources maybe?
>>
>> Dennis D.  W7QHO
>> Glendale, CA
>>
>> ****************
>> On Oct 20, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Mike Everette wrote (in part):
>>
>>> I never, ever had a problem with audio from a Command receiver,
>>> SCR-522, BC-348 or BC-312/342
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ARC5 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5343 - Release Date: 10/20/12
>