[ARC5] More on Battleship Gunnery
Mike Everette
radiocompass at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 4 21:19:21 EST 2012
A bit of probably useless trivia... I would find it very difficult to believe that any number of 5" guns would equal out to six more main battery (16 inch) guns aboard a US battleship. By no stretch of the imagination can the range be the same, especially. So, why would they be included in a "broadside"? The 5s were definitely the secondary battery; and I think they were usually used as AA weapons (or am I mistaken about that).
73
Mike
W4DSE
--- On Sun, 11/4/12, gordon white <gewhite at crosslink.net> wrote:
> From: gordon white <gewhite at crosslink.net>
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] More on Battleship Gunnery
> To: "Robert Eleazer" <releazer at earthlink.net>
> Cc: arc5 at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Sunday, November 4, 2012, 8:39 PM
> An
> interesting technical analysis of the details of the
> gunnery
> of the major batteries of the battleships, but the trees of
> these
> details might obscure the forest: Whatever lacks there were
> in the
> battleships' fire, Adm Jesse Oldendorf's battle
> line virtually wiped
> out the Japanese force trying to get through Suriago Strait
> to attack
> MacArthur's landing force in Leyte Gulf. It was, as
> Morison noted in
> his history, the last major-caliber naval gun battle in
> history, and the
> last "crossing of the (enemy's) "T", a naval maneuver dating
> back to the
> first use of gunpowder in naval warfare, centuries earlier.
> Possibly
> even before that. (Surigao Strait was fought on October
> 25th, 1944,
> coincidentally my 11th birthday)
> - Gordon White
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list