[ARC5] CW Use in Fighters

[J. Forster]

More relevant than YOUR post::

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] [ARC5] UHF Connector Questions
From:    "Brian Clarke" <brianclarke01 at optusnet.com.au>
Date:    Wed, March 21, 2012 4:20 pm
To:      "D C *Mac* Macdonald" <k2gkk at hotmail.com>
         jfor at quikus.com
Cc:      boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
         arc5 at mailman.qth.net
         Armyradios at yahoogroups.com
         milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
         Vintage-Military-RADAR at yahoogroups.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello Mac,

I am making this public because you have not answered my emails for months.

We had been corresponding since July 2011 about our swapping some Command
components. Another American colleague, Lenox sent you a Command transmitter
in December 2011 for you to batch up with the one you were to send to me.
The last I heard directly from you was on 6th January 2012. But I see that
you keep sniping at others on various lists since January 2012.

Why are you not answering my emails? When do you intend to send the goods
that we had agreed?

If you no longer wish to exchange that transmitter we identified, please
advise the cost of shipping the transmitter that Lenox sent to you for me.

73 de Brian, VK2GCE.

----------

AND, why the hell did you addresws the above SPAM to ME? I have had NO
dealings with either you or Mac. And, frankly, I don't want to.

Get REAL!!! Go chase kangaroos or something.

-John

====================





> And the relationship of your comment to 'CW use in fighters' is ... ?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J. Forster" <jfor at quikus.com>
> To: "Dennis DuVall" <scr522 at earthlink.net>
> Cc: <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>; "Robert Eleazer" <releazer at earthlink.net>
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 5:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] CW Use in Fighters
>
>
>> Aaaah! The GOOD stuff!
>>
>> They always take away the stuff that really works.  :))
>>
>> -John
>>
>> ======
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 24, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Sandy wrote:
>>>
>>>> I guess "Uncle Stupid" is striking again!  Wonder what the military
>>>> aircraft
>>>> industry is using as a substitute?
>>>
>>> Zinc Chromate paint is highly toxic and contains hexavalent chrome
>>> (Chromium VI),  a
>>> category 1 carcinogen
>>>
>>> Dennis D.  W7QHO
>>> Glendale, CA
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> ARC5 mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ARC5 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>