[ARC5] Bash Hams from 1980
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Fri Dec 21 13:24:24 EST 2012
On 21 Dec 2012 at 13:09, Mike Morrow wrote:
> Regardless of the FCC exam era, it is my opinion that only the Morse
> test represented any achievement in passing a ham exam. The same
> thing applies to the old commercial Radiotelephone First Class license
> versus the commercial Radiotelegraph license of *any* class, before
> the FCC punted in the mid-1990s by allowing commercial Morse exam
> credit from the far far less strenuous ham Extra Morse exam.
Well, I don't know about that: sometime in the 1960s, I went over from
Missoula, Montana where I lived for 30 years, to Seattle, Washington, which
was our closest "quarterly examining point" to upgrade from my Conditional
Class license, which I had held since about 1957.
I went into the FCC office as soon as it opened, and took and passed the 1st
Class Radio Telephone exam in its entirety, the 2nd Class Radio Telegraph
(again, in its entirety), and since I had a Conditional Class Amateur License,
the General, Advanced, and Extra exams.
Of all those examinations I took the very most difficult one and the most
technically challenging was the Amateur Extra.
The 20 WPM code test I took was absolutely identical for both the
commercial radio telegraph license and the amateur extra. In fact, there was
a marine radio officer retaking his code test at the same session since he
had accidentally let his license lapse and had to retake the test. Of course he
passed with no problem.
When I finally left the FCC office late in the afternoon (as I remember it, the
office was closing), I had passed all elements and had a splitting headache.
At that time, the exam for Amateur Extra was the most difficult.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the ARC5
mailing list