[ARC5] More ZB

[Mike Hanz]

On 7/8/2011 12:09 PM, WA5CAB at cs.com wrote:
> No.  It would have had a JAN nomenclature.  I don't have the Operator's
> Manual on the AN/ARR-1 but the test oscillator would have been TS-something,
> not I-something.

Correct - the test set for the ARR-1 was the TS-1/ARR-1, and the one for 
the ARR-2 was the TS-24/ARR-2.

> In a message dated 7/8/2011 10:56:12 AM Central Daylight Time,
> scr287 at att.net writes:
>
> I have two of the test oscillators for the ZB system. One is a
> Navy CZR-60013, the other one has what looks like an
> Army tag.  A contract number of 9245-WF-43.
>
> But, the nomenclature part of the tag has been obliterated.
> There is just the tip of the first character showing, which looks
> like it *might* be an A, but that doesn't seem like it would be
> right. Seems like it should be an I-something.
>
> So the question is, did this test oscillator have a Signal Corps
> designation?