[ARC5] the age old battle of modify or sanctify...
MillerKE6F at aol.com
MillerKE6F at aol.com
Tue Feb 8 02:38:44 EST 2011
Thank you for the comments. I disagree with your premise that the "Un
Hacked" stuff came out of old surplus vendor stores. Show me the documents to
support the claim. As one who has been collecting this junk for many
decades, all my truly pristine mil gear came from Ham sources in recent years
although I did buy some New in Box command receivers back in the late 50s
from Sams Surplus and a number of other surplus vendors on Radio Row not to
mention R and W in Chicago and of course Good Old Fair Radio.
I will give you the point that a lot of the later stuff is turning up from
time to time out of NATO sources, but that's mostly post WWII stuff. Some
of my GRC-9 stuff came out of French NATO sources and others.
But my real bitch, so to speak, is the continual moaning and groaning about
"Hacked" surplus junk. I find that term to be quite demeaning and
insulting to those folks who found practical applications for a lot of the stuff
that found its genesis as war materiel. We hams used to call it
Converting the gear, not hacking it. Been there, done that and what a great time I
had converting my Command Sets and building power supplies for my
R-105/ARR15 and so on. What an education too. So let's be a bit kinder to the
folks who converted the stuff to good use and at least pay some homage to those
intrepid folks who, without the surplus marketplace, would probably taken
up stamp collecting or miniature golf.
Now I'll probably get it from the stamp collectors and miniature
golfer folks. I just can't win. I bloody quit
Bob, KE6F
More information about the ARC5
mailing list