[ARC5] ARC5 Digest, Vol 80, Issue 90

[Andy Young]

What an amazing coincidence that the ARC-3 is mentioned, I was going to post 
a request straight after checking my current emails!

I have just (yesterday evening) acquired an ARC-3 Tx, RX and PSU. No cables 
or control unit. I guess they are quite common in their country of birth, 
but I don't think at all common here in the UK. I have no information at 
all. Can anyone point me in a direction where I could get a manual 
(original, copy or download), please?
I have searched on Google and drawn a blank other than simple references to 
the existence of the set.

Very many thanks,

Andy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <arc5-request at mailman.qth.net>
To: <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:00 PM
Subject: ARC5 Digest, Vol 80, Issue 90


> Send ARC5 mailing list submissions to
> arc5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> arc5-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> arc5-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ARC5 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: WTD: DY-21 (ARC-3) Dynamotor (Kenneth G. Gordon)
>   2. BC-AP-0229 (CharlesWhite)
>   3. Re: Cost of sets - 1950 and 2010 (Neil)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:56:44 -0700
> From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006 at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] WTD: DY-21 (ARC-3) Dynamotor
> To: David Stinson <arc5 at ix.netcom.com>
> Cc: Arc5 at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <4C9A5F7C.11963.F3B8F1C at kgordon2006.verizon.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On 22 Sep 2010 at 0:00, David Stinson wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have a DY-21 dynamotor from the ARC-3
>> for which they would make a trade?
>
> Dave:
>
> I have 4 ARC-3s here, at least one of which is a transmitter. I haven't 
> had
> one open for quite some time. Wasn't the dynamotor external?
>
> Ken W7EKB
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:13:23 -0700
> From: "CharlesWhite" <CharlesWhite at hughes.net>
> Subject: [ARC5] BC-AP-0229
> To: <ARC5 at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <002101cb5a2e$0dc0dd90$6801a8c0 at xyzds8il6kyami>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Looking for the pin outs for a BC-AP-229 receiver. Thanks in Advance
>
> Charles
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:55:07 +1200
> From: "Neil" <neilb at ihug.co.nz>
> Subject: Re: [ARC5] Cost of sets - 1950 and 2010
> To: "Discussion of AN/ARC-5 military radio equipment."
> <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <E5C479B3C9BF46C397813A19918307E1 at LOUNGE>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
>>and there are 4.5L per gallon.
>
>> Les
>
> That's true for the Imperial gallon, but most members on the list are 
> Americans,
> and it's more appropriate to convert to the US gallon, viz. about 3.8 L 
> per US gallon.
> Incidentally, this is why the US 55 gallon oil barrel was always called a 
> 44 gallon
> drum or barrel when I was a kid. Surplus ones were commonly used here for
> backyard incinerators to dispose of rubbish. Illegal now of course. The 
> conversion
> is roughly 4/5ths, or 0.8. There's a theory in some circles that Amelia 
> Earhart's
> plane was mistakenly fuelled using the wrong units prior to her last 
> takeoff, causing
> her to run short of fuel.
>
> Regards
> Neil ZL1ANM
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>
>
> End of ARC5 Digest, Vol 80, Issue 90
> ************************************
>