[ARC5] ZB Discussion
J. Forster
jfor at quik.com
Sun May 23 21:50:12 EDT 2010
It would have been possible to use an ELINT receiver to find the carrier
frequency, then a panadapter to find the IF, but doing it in time to be of
tactical use would be pushing it for WW II gear, I think.
Best,
-John
===============
> A friend of mine who was a USN radio technician during WWII told me that
> both the sector codes and the transmission frequencies were changed
> multiple times during the day and pilots had to look at a chart they were
> provided with in order to figure out what code to use when.
>
> I would presume that the encoding frequencies (IF settings) were changed
> too, but I would guess that happened less often.
>
> My friend also says that the pilots were told until they received the
> signal, were told to note the altitude where reception first occurred, and
> they given charts that enabled then to equate reception altitude with
> distance from the carrier, presumably simply based on Line of Sight.
>
> Now I wonder if all of the ZB and ARR-2 installations were accessible by
> the pilot of a single seat fighter? It sure sounds like it if they had to
> change frequencies.
>
> Thanks for the info!
>
> Wayne, WB5WSV
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list