[ARC5] ARC-5 Mods
Bob Macklin
macklinbob at msn.com
Thu Jan 1 19:39:05 EST 2009
Consider that these receivers were made for a few pilots to communicate with
each other not for a million hams trying to operate in a 100KC segment!
In 1958 I also had a BC-312 or BC-342 as my main receiver. Even it was
difficult to use on the ham bands in those days.
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Kent (Seattle), Wa,
"Real Radios Glow in the Dark"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006 at verizon.net>
To: "Kevin Berlen" <kberlen at verizon.net>; "ARC-5" <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ARC5] ARC-5 Mods
> On 1 Jan 2009 at 8:38, Kevin Berlen wrote:
>
> > I once heard someone
> > describe the receivers as having "no perceivable selectivity".
>
> Well...sorta. Although awfully broad (purposely), they were
> adequate when the band was not too cluttered.
>
> > That
> > may be true, but they still work remarkably well.
>
> I firmly believe that the "ARC-5" series of receivers were
> simply the finest single-band receivers ever built.
>
> Ken W7EKB
> _______________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list