[ARC5] ARC-5 Mods
Kevin Berlen
kberlen at verizon.net
Wed Dec 31 17:44:32 EST 2008
Hello all. I have lurked on this list for several years, but have not
posted previously. I enjoy the
discussion regarding these fine sets, and have appreciated them ever
since my "elmer" helped
me get a BC-455 working as part of my novice station in 1975. I have
a small collection currently,
but always look at hamfests for another unit to bring home.
I thought I would offer an alternative, if un-popular, view of some
of the modifications that have
been performed upon these fine old radios.
Somewhat like classic aircraft, I believe that there is room for both
100% original non-modifed
units, and for units that have been subjected to some sort of
modification to make them practical
and reliable to operate. I would have never developed my long lasting
affection for these units had
I not been introduced to them for use in my novice station (paired
with a DX-40).
The analogy that comes to my mind is one featuring one of the
aircraft that these units were
installed in, the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress. I visit the Air Force
Museum at Wright-Patterson
often. It is wonderful to see a completely restored, authentic B-17
on display. This aircraft has
been stone cold since it's restoration several years ago. It is a
pristine example for all future
generations of what a B-17 isand should be.
This summer, I had the privilege of attending an air show where one
of the remaining flight
worthy B-17's made an appearance. When this aircraft made a low pass
down the flight line,
with all four engines screaming, flying, in the air, doing the job it
was designed to do, the
hair on the back of my neck stood up. It was a marvellous experience.
This same show
featured no less than five B-47/DC-3's and seven P-51 Mustangs. Given
the choice between
the museum example, and one out, being used, in my mind the choice is
simple. I would
rather experience the operational aircraft.
I guess the point I am driving at is, in my opinion, these radios
will be appreciated by some
who otherwise my not have picked one up if they are put in shape to
be used regularly. I have
always been in awe of the engineering and attention to detail that
went into the design and
manufacture of these radios. Hopefully others who pick one up will
develop the same appreciation
for them.
I certainly would not condone modification of pristine sets today,
but finding a unit that has
already been modified at a hamfest is not difficult, and "improving
it" as was featured in the
recent QST article, I can see nothing wrong with. Just my .02 worth. 73,
Kevin, K9HX
More information about the ARC5
mailing list