[ARC5] Re: A Useful ARC-5 Reference

[WA5CAB at cs.com]

Au contraire.  Someone accepted some at least long enough for them to get 
orange QA stamps and then surplussed out.  I've never actually had a BC-942 but 
I've had at two BC-950's, complete with small rack connectors in the rear, 815 
up front, and original SCR-274-N nameplates.  Sold the last one in 2005.  Plus 
several T-23's that had started life as BC-950's.

In a message dated 4/6/2008 4:56:43 PM Central Daylight Time, 
kk5f at earthlink.net writes: 
> Robert,
> 
> The write-up mentions that W.E. Co. developed VHF components for the 
> SCR-274-N, but the Army did not accept them for service use (though the Navy did, 
> with modifications).
> 
> Mike / KK5F
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> >Nice summary write-up.  The only obvious error I see is the omission of 
> >BC-942 and BC-950.
> >
> >In a message dated 4/6/2008 4:25:32 PM Central Daylight Time, jfor at quik.com 
> 
> >writes: 
> >>I found this a little while ago. It's a pretty good reference to the
> >>often confusing  'ARC-5' type gear.
> >>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARC-5
> 

Robert Downs - Houston
<http://www.wa5cab.com> (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
<wa5cab at cs.com> (Primary email)
<wa5cab at comcast.net> (Backup email)