[ARC5] Re: ARC-3 etc

[AirRadio]

Just been sent by a fellow collector, a sheet picturing a BC-348 with a 
noise limiter complete with Jack box J-579/MRC-20, (it has a designation 
AN/ARC-27) the receiver also has a new designation as a R-584/MRC-20. Looks 
like a J,N,Q type rx originally. What was this used for, where and what in. 
looks interesting anyone shed some light on it, 73 Max


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <arc5-request at mailman.qth.net>
To: <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: ARC5 Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16


> Send ARC5 mailing list submissions to
> arc5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> arc5-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> arc5-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ARC5 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: [Milsurplus] ARC-3 (John Franke)
>   2. Re: [Milsurplus] ARC-3 (Dan Arney)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:53:36 -0400
> From: "John Franke" <jmfranke at cox.net>
> Subject: [ARC5] Re: [Milsurplus] ARC-3
> To: "Dan Arney" <hankarn at pacbell.net>
> Cc: arc5 at mailman.qth.net, J Forster <jfor at quik.com>,
> milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <013201c8087c$7e4558e0$aedd6044 at youre7075dc078>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
>
> Yes I am well aware of the requirements, but my use is for private
> listening, not flying, which does not require approval and I have the
> appropriate crystals.  I do not have an aircraft and if I did I would not 
> be
> using this receiver.  The US spacing is 0.025 MHz  or 25 kHz, not 0.25 as
> you indicated.  In Europe the spacing is 8.33 kHz.
>
> John  WA4WDL
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dan Arney" <hankarn at pacbell.net>
> To: "John Franke" <jmfranke at cox.net>
> Cc: "J Forster" <jfor at quik.com>; <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>;
> <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] ARC-3
>
>
>> John IIRC the ARC-3/ 49 series is not approved for aero use due to the
>> FREQ. spacing rules at the present time. except if you have the XTAL for
>> the specific frequencies. .25 is now the Standard.
>> YMMV.
>> Hank
>> KN6DI
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:23:55 -0500
> From: Dan Arney <hankarn at pacbell.net>
> Subject: [ARC5] Re: [Milsurplus] ARC-3
> To: John Franke <jmfranke at cox.net>
> Cc: arc5 at mailman.qth.net, J Forster <jfor at quik.com>,
> milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <4708271B.1020108 at pacbell.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> John IIRC the ARC-3/ 49 series is not approved for aero use due to the
> FREQ. spacing rules at the present time. except if you have the XTAL for
> the specific frequencies. .25 is now the Standard.
> YMMV.
> Hank
> KN6DI
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>
>
> End of ARC5 Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16
> ************************************
>