[Milsurplus] Re: [ARC5] What did they talk to ??
k0ng at inebraska.com
k0ng at inebraska.com
Tue May 3 22:29:59 EDT 2005
Mike: Good example. Also, I know from experience that our ARC-27 transceivers
in the F86 worked pretty well to 225 miles when at good altitude. This was at
225 Mc or so. They were quite a bit better than the ARC-4 but about equal to
the SCR-522. PS, I have one of each of the above, minus the F86.
Charlie, K0NG AFSC 30171A
Quoting Mike Morrow <kk5f at earthlink.net>:
> >Also the question was asked about the max range of the SCR-522 on VHF.
>
> Many of the WWII airborne VHF set operating instruction manuals contain a
> graph of line-of-sight miles vs. aircraft altitude, and that range was pretty
> much independent of the power output of the transmitters. The graph that's
> in the manual for the AN/ARC-4 (AN 08-10-245), for example, gives the
> following:
>
> Altitude (ft) VHF LOS Range (Statute Miles)
>
> 1000 40
> 10000 115
> 30000 210
>
> Mike / KK5F
> _______________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>
More information about the ARC5
mailing list