[ARC5] Screw usage
Mike Hanz
[email protected]
Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:37:41 -0500
> There are both black and nickel #3 screws used in the ARC-5 sets. Was
> there any particular scheme for selecting which was used where?
Esthetics? :-) That strange screw finish dichotomy (on the receivers
especially) has always puzzled me as well, though it descends to a level
of esoterica that can be somewhat mind numbing. The original
fabrication drawings for the receivers simply show ARC #6017 black oxide
screws all around the front lip (except the bottom) and the first 3 from
the front for the top cover on each side. These are all 7/32" long.
All the rest of the cover screws and bottom plate screws are specified
as 3/16" ARC #4058s, which are nickel plated. This is true right from
the beginning - the very first 1939 preliminary RAT manual shows it that
way.
Why? Neither the drawings nor manuals give any apparent clue. It might
have been a desire to reduce bright reflection points when reviewed from
the front, but then that premise is ignored with the transmitters that
were introduced 3 years later - they use a nickel plated 1/4" throughout
on the top and bottom covers. The answer may be something like an
original Navy 'anti-reflection' requirement which was eliminated on the
ATA transmitters but never modified on the receivers - I've run into
several cases of manufacturing inconsistencies like that in the command
series. Most would seem to be caused by inertia - using the same
drawings over and over again for later products without a careful review
of what could be changed. There's a war on, don't ya know?
It also may be - and I'm leaning more toward this explanation lately -
that the only finished ARC drawings available in 1939 for these
particular length screws had the disparate finishes already specified
for an earlier application, and the designer didn't think it worth
stocking yet another type of the same length screw just to change the
finish. That would apply to the finish of the capacitor mounting screws
as well. Of such small decisions are such large debates later begun...
Best 73,
Mike