[Antennas] Small Triband Beam

[Ross Primrose]

On 2/27/2015 2:38 PM, n8de at thepoint.net wrote:
> He said 12' turning RADIUS .. not diameter.

The A3S has a 15.5' turning radius.  Last time I checked, that was well 
over 12'...

73, Ross N4RP

>
> 73
> Don
> N8DE
>
>
> Quoting Ross Primrose <n4rp at n4rp.com>:
>
>> That's well over his turning radius limit.  The Cushcraft MA5B might be
>> a better fit...
>>
>> 73, Ross N4RP
>>
>> On 2/27/2015 1:17 PM, n8de at thepoint.net wrote:
>>> Cushcraft A3S is a well-performing tri-bander.
>>> Have on up here at 34' and have worked over 300 DXCC with it the  
>>> past three years.
>>> 73
>>> Don
>>> N8DE
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting "David C. Hallam" <dhallam at knology.net>:
>>>
>>>> I am looking for ideas about what would be a good small triband beam.
>>>> About 20 ft. would be about as high up as I could get it. Ideally the
>>>> turning radius would not more than 10 ft but maybe could go to 12 ft.
>>>> My rig runs 900-1000W DC input. lp support this email list: 
>>>> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> FCC Section 97.313(a) "At all times, an amateur station must use the 
>>  minimum transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired  
>> communications."
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Antennas mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>


-- 
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”