[Antennas] Antenna for Local Use

[Richard Solomon]

Thanks to all for the replies. It looks like a horizontal antenna of some
type
(maybe a loop) would be best.

Now here in the high Desert, what they call trees, I call deformed shrubs !!

So, it won't be going up that high.

Tnx again,

73, Dick, W1KSZ


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:23 PM, <telegrapher at q.com> wrote:

> Plain old Dipole Dick not to high in the air.  Gives a lot of straight up
> radiation but still some outward range.  My 40M dipole is only 25 feet up
> at the middle which seems to get me into Tucson real well and also into
> California and New Mexico when they are on the air.  Clud burners is one
> name for low dipoles.
>
> larry
> W0OGH
> Gilbert, AZ.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz at gmail.com>
> To: antennas at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:59:35 -0500 (EST)
> Subject: [Antennas] Antenna for Local Use
>
> What would folks recommend for an antenna for just chewing the
> rag with locals (up to a 50 mile radius). The vertical I now have is
> just too noisy. The primary interest is 80/40/15.
>
> Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>