[Antennas] New Carolina Windom Balun?
Niel - W0VLZ
w0vlz at aggienetwork.com
Mon Mar 15 00:41:40 EDT 2010
In preparation for spring (and the snow melting) here in Minnesota I
put together a "New Carolina Windom" described at
http://www.hamuniverse.com/k4iwlnewwindom.html and
http://www.w5fc.org/files/how-to/QRP%20Expressions_version_1.pdf . I
have a question.
Why not use a 4:1 transformer rather than a 4:1 balun so that radiation
from that 10' feedline is maximized rather than balanced out?
The articles specify using a 4:1 balun at the off-center feedpoint. I
understand that you want the 4:1 transformation to match the off-center
feed point impedance but why a 4:1 balun rather than just a 4:1
transformer? I thought that a balun is typically used to reduce
radiation from the feedline but, in fact, for this antenna you want
feedline radiation. The feedline serves as a radiation pattern enhancing
vertical radiator. Why use a balun? Won't that reduce radiation from the
feedline?
Thanks,
Niel - W0VLZ
http://www.prismnet.com/~nielw/wa5vlz.htm
More information about the Antennas
mailing list