[Antennas] J-Pole antennas
Terry Conboy
n6ry at arrl.net
Fri Nov 27 11:27:31 EST 2009
I haven't seen the original design of the J-Pole from the 1940's nor
details of the approach used in Zeppelins. Perhaps Clete can comment if
they used a link coupling to prevent the unavoidable unbalanced currents
on the 1/4 wavelength stub from flowing (and radiating) or otherwise
describe the proper feed method.
In all the modern implementations that I've seen, whether feed on the
bottom shunt or a little above it on the 1/4 wl stub, regardless of
which side is considered "hot", there will be current in an attached
conducting supporting structure (and coax shield) if some sort of choke
balun isn't used. These designs and the supporting mast are easily
modeled in NEC2 and the current flow can be significant, with the
magnitude depending on the length of the conducting support and/or coax
shield. For an excellent discussion of this topic, see
http://www.w8ji.com/end-fed_vertical_j-pole_and_horizontal_zepp.htm
73, Terry N6RY
On 2009-11-27 4:36 AM, Clete Whitaker wrote:
> de WB2CPN
> The VHF J-Pole design came about prior to WWII, and was
> used by US Army in the 100 - 156 MHz range. It was used
> on HF years before that, but wasn't called a J-Pole. It was
> called a Zeppelin because that's what it was used on. It kept
> the high RF voltages away from the airship. TRIVIA: There
> have been so many ideas on what a J-Pole is supposed to
> look like that there is no "Right or Wrong" any more. Now
> days they are made to look like miniature Zepps that are
> incorrectly fed part way down the 1/4 wave section. A well
> designed J-Pole shouldn't need a choke balun at the bottom,
> but the ones made these days do, because of the improper
> method of feed. A highly inflaming subject, we're in here.
> End of Trivia.
> 73 Clete
>
>
More information about the Antennas
mailing list