[Antennas] Antenna-Related Patents

[Paul]

Chris Trask wrote:

> 
>>   This is not a "binocular" core as defined in
>> the patent, because it does not have a top surface and bottom surface
>> and a rib.  Now you might say it works just a well, and I wouldn't
>> argue that, but it doesn't count as far as the patent is concerned.
>>
> 
>     You obviously did not understand claim #6 in the patent, or perhaps you
> just skipped that one.
> 
> Chris

this appears to be suspiciously close to the 'software patents' issue - 
I've patented 1+1=2  your patent of 2+1=3 infringes mine (or Bach has 
patented 'B# followed by E)

If the words are long enough, and the document has enough pretty 
pictures it'll get through the patenting process.

The *REAL* test is IF he's got he balls to try to sue someone. ;)

Paul 5B8BA


-- 
People who read tabloids deserve getting lied to.
- Jerry Seinfeld