[Antennas]efficient antenna tuning
DJED1 at aol.com
DJED1 at aol.com
Sun Feb 11 11:35:22 EST 2007
N8DE has suggested leaving the antenna alone and operating- while that has
it's benefits, I thing the original poster was looking into how he could
operate over the entire 40M band without climbing on the roof to retune the
bugcatcher. Since my comments caused some confusion with N8DE, I'll try and
clarify for the benefit of all.
In general, it is known in the technical community that an untuned antenna
should either be tuned for a match to the transmitter at the antenna, or using
a low-loss transmission line, at the rig. Open wire line is commonly
recommended for a low-loss line. The issue is that the loss on the line increases
with SWR, even if you have a tuner at the rig so that the rig sees an
impedance match.
In this case the coax loss is only about 0.4 dB for a matched line, but can
go above 1 dB for a SWR of 8 or so. (For N8DE's benefit, the SWR on the line
is related only to the antenna impedance and the impedance of the coax. A
tuner at the rig matches the impedance of the line-antenna combination to 50
ohms, but doesn't change the SWR on the line. Calculators for cable loss vs SWR
are available on the net and in ARRL publications.)
So the first choice of several posters was to put the tuner at the antenna.
Costs about $200, and has about 1 dB of loss for the tuner and 0.4 dB of
cable loss. I agree, and I use an ICOM AH4 tuner with a whip on my portable rig.
Given that the original requirement was for QRP and low cost, I considered a
small QRP tuner at the rig, which may cost less than an AH4. In this case,
the cable dissipation will be more, depending on how high the SWR of the
antenna is at the ends of the band. Even with a 10:1 SWR, however, the cable
loss increases to only about 1 dB, with the tuner adding another 1 dB. So this
is the best tradeoff of performance and cost.
Finally, I suggested detuning the antenna if all that was available for
tuning was a capacitor. To answer the question about series or parallel would
require some assumptions about the antenna impedance and some transmission line
calculations (remember Smith charts?), which I'm too lazy to do right now.
however, the added cable loss make this a poor choice.
So my recommendation is to set the antenna at the center of the band, get an
inexpensive tuner and install it at the rig, and go have fun.
Just my .02 based on 25 years as an Extra and 35 years as an RF engineer
Ed
More information about the Antennas
mailing list