[Antennas] PRB-1

[Harvey&Bessie]

Dave Harmon wrote:

>Not really.....it's all about controlling someone else and forcing them
>to do whatever the developer wants like.....
>Garage doors open for only 40 minutes....
>Can't park in your own driveway for more than 6 hours.....
>Can't park on the street at anytime, like never.....
>Can't own a pickup truck.....
>Driveway must be a certain size and material....
>Trees must be planted in a certain pattern of a certain type within a
>certain time after home purchase....
>On and on and on......
>
>Regards
>
>Dave Harmon
>NSRCA 586
>K6XYZ[at]valornet[dot]com
>Broken Arrow, Ok.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>[mailto:antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Francesco Ledda
>Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:04 AM
>To: antennas at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: RE: [Antennas] PRB-1
>
>Well, it is all about keeping the surface clean and shiny. 
>
>The facts that their kids are addicted to TV, probably on drugs and that
>their bank accounts are almost overdrawn doesn't matter. 
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>[mailto:antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of w8okn at charter.net
>Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:51 AM
>To: antennas at mailman.qth.net; k6mhe at k6mhe.com; James Duffer
>Subject: RE: [Antennas] PRB-1
>
>
>I'm pretty ticked at the way this station presented it.  It was a
>horrible dis-service to this country to portray hams, who help with so
>many emergencies, as the bad guys.  It came across as saying that since
>antennas are ugly, to them, then they're not worth it.  How ignorant is
>that?  
>
>W8OKN
>
>
>---- James Duffer <dufferjames at hotmail.com> wrote: 
>  
>
>>I was wondering if in this case, the individual has not signed the 
>>covenants.  Sure wish he could of been on the progam.  Since they
>>    
>>
>state he 
>  
>
>>is legal, he may have some sort of "grandfathered" rights.
>>
>>Once again, "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder"
>>
>>73, Jim, de wd4air
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>From: Danny Richardson <k6mhe at k6mhe.com>
>>>To: antennas at mailman.qth.net
>>>Subject: RE: [Antennas] PRB-1
>>>Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:04:48 -0700
>>>
>>>At 05:58 AM 5/11/2006, you wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Sooner or later someone is going to actually read PRB-1 and
>>>>        
>>>>
>understand
>  
>
>>>>that PRB-1 does not override the damned covenants.
>>>>Then, he will have to take it down.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>That has been known for some time and has been often repeated in
>>>      
>>>
>amateur 
>  
>
>>>publications.
>>>
>>>Danny, K6MHE
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>>>Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/335 - Release Date:
>>>      
>>>
>5/9/2006
>  
>
>>>______________________________________________________________
>>>Antennas mailing list
>>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
>>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>>>Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>>>      
>>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>Antennas mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>>Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>>    
>>
>______________________________________________________________
>Antennas mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>

>IMHO: A person would have to be very stupid to sign a purchase agreement or lease with those kinds of restrictions, no matter how desireable the house seemed to be.
>
Harvey/W4TG

>  
>