[Antennas] PRB-1

[w8okn at charter.net]

I'm pretty ticked at the way this station presented it.  It was a horrible dis-service to this country to portray hams, who help with so many emergencies, as the bad guys.  It came across as saying that since antennas are ugly, to them, then they're not worth it.  How ignorant is that?  

W8OKN


---- James Duffer <dufferjames at hotmail.com> wrote: 
> I was wondering if in this case, the individual has not signed the 
> covenants.  Sure wish he could of been on the progam.  Since they state he 
> is legal, he may have some sort of "grandfathered" rights.
> 
> Once again, "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder"
> 
> 73, Jim, de wd4air
> 
> 
> >From: Danny Richardson <k6mhe at k6mhe.com>
> >To: antennas at mailman.qth.net
> >Subject: RE: [Antennas] PRB-1
> >Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:04:48 -0700
> >
> >At 05:58 AM 5/11/2006, you wrote:
> >>Sooner or later someone is going to actually read PRB-1 and understand
> >>that PRB-1 does not override the damned covenants.
> >>Then, he will have to take it down.
> >
> >That has been known for some time and has been often repeated in amateur 
> >publications.
> >
> >Danny, K6MHE
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/335 - Release Date: 5/9/2006
> >
> >
> >______________________________________________________________
> >Antennas mailing list
> >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> >Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net