[Antennas] Re: increased ant bandwidths...

[Robert Lay (W9DMK)]

If someone will refresh my memory as to the month and year when QST last did
a review of several tuners, I will look it up - Hi Danny - how've you been?

73 de W9DMK - Bob Lay, Dahlgren, VA
http://www.zaffora.com/W9DMK/W9dmk.html
w9dmk at crosslink.net
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Richardson" <k6mhe at k6mhe.com>
To: <antennas at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Antennas] Re: increased ant bandwidths...


> At 07:56 PM 4/29/2006, you wrote:
>>I don't think there is any controversy or disagreement with regard to the 
>>basic operational concepts involved here. Where there might be a 
>>difference of opinion is in regard to how bad the losses can be in a 
>>tuner. There have been some carefully done experiments reported in QST 
>>over the years that make it quite clear that the losses in antenna tuners 
>>are a lot more than most people would imagine.
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> I'm curious what are you considering as a lot more loss than some imagine?
>
> 73,
> Danny, K6MHE
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/327 - Release Date: 4/28/2006
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net