[Antennas] Dipole "Multi-band" pairs?
Philip Atchley
beaconeer at sbcglobal.net
Tue Nov 29 20:50:02 EST 2005
Hi All,
I realize that when making "fan" multi-band dipoles, even harmonicly
related bands are best (7/14MC etc) due to the unused dipole being of
higher impedance. How about Non-harmonically related. As they are
going to be used as guy wires on a push- up pole and their relative
lengths, I'm proposing the following "band pairs". The legs of each
'pair' would be 'approximately' 90 degrees apart, guy wire fashion.
1. 7.2 & 10.1MC for the topmost Inverted Vee pair, perhaps using the
7MC one for 21MC also. Are the 7 & 10MC freqs too close and would they
interact too much?
2. 14.2 & 28.6MC for the next lower pair on the mast. alternately this
antenna MIGHT turn out to be a 14/21MC pair. They will be mounted lower
than the low freq antennas to keep the Apex angle a little wider and to
space them away from the lower band antennas.
Does anyone here see a 'problem' with these band 'pairs'. They will be
mounted above a sheet metal mobile home roof where the present 21MC
single band Inverted Vee performs well as does the half sized G5RV that
these antennas will replace. The new Butternut HF-2V is performing well
on 75/40M and will remain. I'm trying to ELIMINATE the use of a antenna
tuner as much as possible!
******************************************************
73 de Phil, KO6BB
If it's over 1dB above the Noise Floor, "IT AIN'T DX"!
THE BEACONEER'S LAIR: http://www.geocities.com/ko6bb/
QSL GALLERY: http://photobucket.com/albums/y123/KO6BB/
Merced, Central California, 37.3N 120.48W CM97sh
******************************************************
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/188 - Release Date: 11/29/2005
More information about the Antennas
mailing list