[Antennas] 160 Inverted L 160 Radials

[Dan Richardson]

At 02:06 PM 11/17/2005, you wrote:
>Unfornuately, the alleged study at any University has never been proven to
>have been done!
>See http://www.snopes.com/language/apocryph/cambridge.asp for more info
>
>Chris
>WB5ITT


That may be very well correct, but it misses the point I was trying to make.

I remember many moons ago when, just a lad, in high school. I had an 
English teacher who had an English text book printed in the early 1800s. In 
it was a word (darn, I forgot what the word was) that had been spelled 
three different ways - in the same book! It seems that during the last 
century we have become far more fussy about spelling than in previous times.

A few years back I visited a Lewis and Clark display in Washington state. 
In reading the writings in their log books I saw they were very poor 
spellers - but I could read and understand what they were saying.

73,
Danny, K6MHE





-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/173 - Release Date: 11/16/2005