[Antennas] 160 Inverted L 160 Radials

[Jerry Forwood]

Frankly, I have a problem with people that post websites where they don't even know the difference between the words to and two! As in 2 two 1 SWR! :0(
Learn to proof read before you post!  You are showing your intelligence , or lack of it, to the world!

73 de Jerry, KØEJF
E.J.(Jerry) Forwood

-- W3OA <w3oa at adelphia.net> wrote:
I'd like to put up a 160 antenna. I'm thinking of an inverted L.  The 
vertical section would be 54 feet and I have room for a horizontal 
section up to 157 feet long.  I am concerned about the radial field - 
it's approximately square, about 90 feet on each side.  Is this 
hopelessly small?  Should I try something like KE4UYP suggests at 
http://members.tripod.com/~KE4UYP/80m_160m_Antenna.html?  I'd like to 
hear of peoples success, or failure, trying his design.

Thanks for any suggestions - Dick, W3OA

______________________________________________________________
Antennas mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net