[Antennas] Design questions for directional antennas
David Robbins K1TTT
k1ttt at arrl.net
Sun Jul 31 16:31:11 EDT 2005
That is true, however I considered it beyond the scope of the original
question.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:antennas-
> bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dr. William J. Schmidt, II
> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 20:18
> To: David Robbins K1TTT; 'A10382'; 'Antenna reflector list'
> Subject: Re: [Antennas] Design questions for directional antennas
>
> Well, hold up... these is one more little issue with grounded vs.
> ungrounded
> elements for consideration. Ungrounded elements had the capability of
> storing static charge (e.g. wind charging). you may then have the
> equivalent of a small spark transmitter sitting on the antenna as the
> element discharges to the boom (under the right circumstances). Same is
> true for verticals, and the reason I *always* ground my radiators (DC
> through chokes) and parasitic elements.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dr. William J. Schmidt, II K9HZ
> Trustee of the North American QRO - Central Division Club - K9ZC
>
> Email: bill at wjschmidt.com
> WebPage: www.wjschmidt.com
>
> "If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee;
> that
> will do them in." -- Bradley's Bromide
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt at arrl.net>
> To: "'A10382'" <A10382 at snet.net>; "'Antenna reflector list'"
> <antennas at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 2:40 PM
> Subject: RE: [Antennas] Design questions for directional antennas
>
>
> > 1) Some yagis have their non-radiating elements electrically connected
> > to the boom (and therefore each other). I copied a Cushcraft 900 yagi
> > (with a metal boom), but made the boom on mine out of wood (using the
> > same diameter and length radiators for all elements). I did not connect
> > the non-radiating elements - the directors and the reflector -- to each
> > other. While I did not notice any difference in performance between the
> > two, I also do not have an antenna range to verify exact performance,
> > alternatively relying on just operating.
> >
> > Q1: Is there any effect on performance by either connecting/grounding
> > the non-radiating elements ??
>
> no. however, the lengths of the elements need to be adjusted to account
> for
> a fat part in the middle when they go through the boom or are mounted on
> plates attached to the boom. Either of those arrangements makes the
> element
> look bigger in diameter in the middle and require a slight shortening of
> the
> element with respect to a free space design to achieve the same
> performance.
>
>
> >
> > 2) Commercially made broadcast TV receiving antennas usually have their
> > elements in a "V" shape (sort of like a horizontal inverted V).
> >
> > Q2a: Other than possibly cosmetics (the antenna 'pointed' at the
> > station) is there a design/performance reason for this ??
> > Q2b" Does this "V" shape have any effect on element length or bandwidth
> > ?
>
> yes it does affect the performance. But also note that these elements are
> normally part of a log periodic array not a Yagi (parasitic) array. The
> designs are very different and can't be interchanged. The log periodic
> array for tv is designed more for bandwidth than gain which is why it has
> lots of close together fed elements.
>
>
> >
> > 3) A dual band yagi design like the 'Arrow' handheld has the elements
> > for the 2 bands at right angles to each other.
> >
> > Q3:Does this type of element positioning eliminate any effect one band's
> > elements has on the other band ?
>
> not completely, but it gets rid of most of the effects.
>
>
> >
> > BTW: The one design that did not work well nagged me. I ended up
> > following a few suggestions, and the performance eventually (and
> > seemingly) closely equaled the original design. The change with the
> > most impact was replacing stainless elements with aluminum (the original
> > design was made with aluminum) - go figure...
>
> steel is a relatively poor conductor of rf compared to aluminum.
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
More information about the Antennas
mailing list