[Antennas] 40m mobile antenna e.r.p. compared
CBoone
CBoone at earthlink.net
Sat Apr 30 15:59:32 EDT 2005
what Sam said in his email to me was:
"almost got ask to move when I had to reminded the landlord that the FCC
said he couldn't just say NO to any and all antennas.."
That is 100% incorrect and not an honest bluff; its demanding something with
false information...there are only certain antennas the landlord cannot
refuse....and only under certain conditions. If the landlord was savvy, he
would already know what he can and cannot refuse in antennas...and to have
someone make such a blanket statement to him will ONLY piss him off and hurt
the overall effort.
Keeping the facts straight and correct leads to a much better
conclusion....that you are DEMANDING your way with false information gets
you no where in the business world or anywhere else!
Chris
WB5ITT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dr.
> William J. Schmidt, II
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 2:34 PM
> To: antennas at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Antennas] 40m mobile antenna e.r.p. compared
>
> Interesting advice... but I must remind you that everyone has
> the right to be wrong. Those of us in the business world
> recognize the value of an "honest bluff" in the heat of competition...
More information about the Antennas
mailing list