[Antennas] Mesh vs Radials for Ground Plane
David W Sher
davew9lya at juno.com
Wed Apr 6 12:45:36 EDT 2005
Don't know if this would be considered a radial or counterpoise, but I
made DXCC with a 14AVQ vertical mounted on an upright of a 90' section of
chain-link fence.
Dave W9LYA
What wrought doG hath?
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:02:34 -0500 fkamp at comcast.net writes:
>
>
> Bob Wilder wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the comments on using mesh for a ground plane. Almost
> everyone
> > said to steer away from mesh for several reasons.
> > 1. Expensive
> > 2. Deteriate to rapidly
> > 3. Radials just as effective
> > Thanks again for comments..Will go with 60-75 radials
> >
>
> That is a lot of radials. I was picturing how I would go about
> installing 60-75 radials for a ground mounted vertical. I had
> considered doing that a few years ago and decided it was a lot of
> work,
> real work. So I tried a single wire counterpoise and roof mounted
> my 23
> foot vertical. I feed it with open wire line and use an antenna
> tuner.
> It works fairly well. Better than the all-band dipole for DX. Now
> I am
> wondering if 60-75 radials in a ground mounted design would work
> even
> better.
>
> Regards,
> Frank Kamp
> K5DKZ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>
>
More information about the Antennas
mailing list