[Antennas] Some thoughts on baluns
Sandy and Kees Talen
[email protected]
Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:55:56 -0600
Thanks for the response. You are right in that a consideration is
overheating the beads and changing characteristics. What I was
trying to do was use a choke balun in a <200w 160m to 10m tuner.
So far I'm at two large type #77 beads with 4 turns, 4.5" dia, of
RG/58U through them. The reasoning is that the 4 turn coil fixes
some shortcomings at 21-30Mhz, the two type #77 work well at
160m, running multiple turns through them increases their
effectiveness approx 16 times (and increases heat ? ...I thought
more choke impedance decreases the heat) ....the down side is
any heat generated ...which I hope to offset some by the fact
that the 4 turn coil will take some of the heat due to it's impedance.
Maybe add a few (2-3) more ferrites to distribute whatever heat.
I've made impedance measurements and it looks good from 160m
to 10m. I have NOT done any power testing ....and may have to
get some hot dogs and fixins ready.
I did try more mass with a larger, #43 material, flat ribbon cable
ferrite spaced further apart with additional ferrite material but
the results were poor at 160m. I was going to try two of these
but haven't had a chance.
I don't want to use a piece of coax with 50+ beads (W2DU), plus
all indications are that they could be improved at 10m. Is that
where they get hot ...10m and 15m ? (low impedance) or is it
80m ? (high impedance) ....maybe add a 6 turn 4" coil to fix the
10m low impedance ?
The backup plan is the use a large 30ft long piece of coax (like
in the AG6K tuner) with a "T" BNC connector at 6 turns and
figure out how to switch that so the 20m-10m performance is
satisfactory.
Great fun.
73 Kees K5BCQ