[AMRadio] Special Bulletin from ARRL

[Rob Atkinson]

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 5:58 PM <manualman at juno.com> wrote:
>
> What's not mentioned in the ARRL blurb, nor is it stated within the
> actual proposal, as to the actual impact to amateur radio/amateur
> facilities and how many would be impacted by this proposal. I would
> assume the ARRL is concerned about amateur owners who have repeaters on
> Federal forestry lands. What else would we have on these lands?
> Personally, if there comes to pass an administrative fee for all
> communication services parked on Federal forestry lands, and if a
> particular amateur radio installation on Federal forestry land is
> considered a communication service, then they should not be immune to a
> fee.

I agree but I wonder if ARRL thinks there's a possibility that any ham
with a mobile rig driving into a Nat. Park will have to pay a fee, and
if those portable QRP "Parks On The Air" guys will have to pay to
operate their special event stations.

Merry Christmas

Rob
K5UJ