[AMRadio] Speech Processing
W2xj
w2xj at w2xj.net
Wed Sep 26 18:48:36 EDT 2018
Scopes haven’t changed much since they were invented. At least not for AM use which is the same regardless of power. BTW GR marketed early scopes as we know them. Also, the FCC never licensed 300 watt stations.
Let’s get back to respecting Jim’s request of discussing processing technology and not antique manufactured gear.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 26, 2018, at 15:20, Doug Hensley <w5jv at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> The GR-1931A was developed for 300 watt AM stations most of which had no free channel evening slot. AM being populated as heavily as it was, the FCC openlyl supported its use and as time told the story, it worked. So with all due respect, 50kw and 2 megawatt monsters hardly relate. Scopes of the period could not do what the 1931A could do.
>
>
> YMOV but Cheers anyway.
>
>
> Doug W5JV
>
>
> Visit https://www.qrz.com/db/W5JV for some great vacuum tube finds. Looking for something special? Ask us.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: donroden at hiwaay.net <donroden at hiwaay.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 5:00 PM
> To: W2xj
> Cc: Doug Hensley; amradio at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Speech Processing
>
> Same here ...... totally agree.
> Don W4DNR
>
>
>
> Quoting W2xj <W2xj at w2xj.net>:
>
>> I have spent most of my career working on AM broadcast rigs, mostly
>> 50 KW to 2 Megawatts. I have never found much use for a modulation
>> monitor. They usually cause more problems than they solve. A scope
>> is much more useful.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Doug Hensley <w5jv at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
More information about the AMRadio
mailing list