[AMRadio] ARRL stance

[manualman at juno.com]

Amateurs will be considered secondary users on the new bands so
restrictions are necessary and important. Primary user, I believe, will
be the PLC.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 01:09:22 +0000 (UTC) CL in NC via AMRadio
<amradio at mailman.qth.net> writes:
> "...from the ARRL about the subject and it provided a link to their 
> stance..."
> 
> I tried to get a similar reply from the ARRL on their stance 
> concerning the new VLF band and it's ridiculous power and antenna 
> regulations. I wanted to know exactly what the comment was from the 
> ARRL concerning the proposed rule making  All I got was a weasel 
> worded reply and go look it up at the FCC, along with the new found 
> knowledge that the ARRL's comments carry the same weight as each 
> individual commentor, and is not representative of their membership 
> or the ham community as a whole.  But their reply pales in 
> comparison to the answer I got from the FCC when I asked about the 
> process involved in coming up with those same ridiculous antenna and 
> power restrictions.  To simplify their reasoning and translate it 
> all into Southerm, the FCC  pulled all that out of their a**.
> 
> Charlie W4MEC in NC