[AMRadio] AM Broadcast Quality
Bry Carling
bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Mon Dec 16 21:56:36 EST 2013
I don't see what is so objectionable about a 8 or 10kHz wide signal if it isn't bothering anyone else.
Bry Carling
http://af4k.com
Sent with my iPhone 6
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:06 PM, "W. Harris" <nbcblue at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> No more band width than necessary for the particular mode of operation. No reason for an AM signal on the ham bands to be 10khz wide just for "broadcast quality".
>
> Bill - K5MIL
>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:50:04 -0500
>> From: "Bernie Doran" <qedconsultants at embarqmail.com>
>> To: "W. Harris" <nbcblue at hotmail.com>, <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
>> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM Broadcast Quality
>> Message-ID: <25F56CE78EB84D9E8C71853D599787A7 at berniePC>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>> reply-type=original
>>
>> Who said the object was using no more bandwidth than necessary? so all CW I
>> guess. Bernie
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Archives: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/amradio/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the AMRadio
mailing list