[AMRadio] OO observation

Mike Sawyer w3slk at verizon.net
Mon Jan 30 17:14:19 EST 2012


Ed, (et al),
    3 moves in roughly the 20 years that occurred since then caused me to 
misplaced the card and the information that goes with it. I just chuckle at 
the thought and chalk it up as a hi-light/lo-light, (depending on how its 
viewed), in my 'ham career.' Should I stumble onto it again, I might have it 
bronzed and placed in the overhead of the 'dungeon,' (that place in the 
bowels of my QTH where I have my station stationed;>).
Mod-U-Lator,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Sieb" <esieb at sympatico.ca>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" 
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] OO observation


Mike(y), please let us know the name of that idiot. It would be useful to 
publicize his
name far and wide as someone who is so incompetent, he probably paid for his 
license.
The nonsense that come our some amateur's mouths sometimes astounds me. 
This idiot should
be made an example of.

Ed, VA3ES
---------------------------------
Mike Sawyer wrote:
    The only OO report I ever got was for being on 40 meters with a carrier 
on my signal.
[...] "You're not supposed to have a carrier on your signal" he proclaimed. 
I told him
that if I was running AM I most certainly will have a carrier. "Well, AM is 
illegal," and
I retorted that he better go back and study the regs to see what modes are 
legal. Then he
proceeded to tell me that I have a lot of
gaul, being a lowly General, telling an Extra like him, what the rules are 
and that he
studied, blah, blah, blah, ad nauseum. I just laughed at him and he hung up 
on me.





More information about the AMRadio mailing list