[AMRadio] AM Radio

[Bob Macklin]

Is there a problem modifying BC transmitters to operate on 160 to 75?

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa.
"Real Radios Glow In The Dark"

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Raper" <kj4hyd at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" 
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM Radio


>
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:01 PM, rbethman wrote:
>
>> Okay, it doesn't remotely cover ANY Amateur Radio Frequency Allocation.
>>
>> So what use is it to the entire conversation?
>
> I am friends with one of the Nautel Engineers, and they can build the 
> J-1000 that I mentioned to operate in the 160 Meter band, if you got the 
> Money.
>
> 73,
> Kevin Raper
> KJ4HYD
> CE WCKI WQIZ WLTQ
>
> There is no limitation to the fidelity of AM radio. From a mathematical 
> standpoint, AM does better in frequency response than FM. - Leonard Kahn
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html