[AMRadio] Comment to a comment

[Bernie Doran]

do you mean they quit putting licenses in raison bran?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "CL in NC" <mjcal77 at yahoo.com>
To: "AM radio" <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 2:08 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Comment to a comment


> >From a previous fellow:
> "Most if not all General class amateurs from 68' on back are still pissed 
> off at that (*^&^$^%*&^# ARRL and FCC for rolling back considerable 
> privileges to I think what they are today. That was a significant loss and 
> it really hurt."
>
> Please don't forget Wayne Green of 73 magazine and the fellow whose name 
> and company escape me now that sells code courses and testing manuals that 
> was heavy into removing CW as a test element.  Keeping the code or 
> removing it, is fodder for a big argument, the new codeless hams don't 
> understand what the fuss is about, and the coded hams can just listen to 
> the bands and come to the conclusion things seem a bit more volatile than 
> the old days.  One thing for sure, it ain't going back, and with the FCC 
> track record with CB radio, the next step will probably be a testless 
> license application in the box with a transceiver.
>
> Charlie, W4MEC in NC,
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html