[AMRadio] AM power

Sat Jun 18 22:44:28 EDT 2011

Ancient modulation, and I love it.
Can't talk like a duck worth a damn

Thanx
Lloyd Godsey KK7IZ
kk7iz at cox.net
480-620-7145
http://www.lloydsdipsydumpster.com/
http://antiqueradioarchives.com/
Skype: lloyd.godsey

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bob Macklin
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 6:14 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM power

WHAT'S AM?

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa.
"Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:51 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] AM power

>I asked about the "375 watt power limit" but I confess it was a loaded
> question, with an agenda, for which I apologize because I hate being
> on the receiving end of such questions and try to stick to saying what
> I think instead of fooling around with manipulative questions.
>
> So my agenda was to make a point, the point being that the mythical
> 375 watt power limit is 100% b.s. on two or three levels, the first
> being it's having a peak envelope power limit as its basis, which is a
> jackass rule since, for one thing, how is this measured with precision
> by an average ham.
>
> Now we get to AM where measuring a carrier to meet an exact numerical
> requirement is basically impossible unless you are at the NIST, and
> measuring peak positive modulation with any accuracy is impossible,
> made more complex with asymmetric voices, which most males have.  We
> can estimate; that's about it.   If the FCC were realistic, the rule
> would provide a fudge factor like a figure +- 5 or 10 % on carrier
> power with a positive modulation limit of 150% and forget the p.e.p.
> crap.  Most hams could stay under that without a lot of fancy
> measuring equipment.    But they don't so I give it all the attention
> it deserves, scaling to its grip on reality.   If there is any tone of
> irritation here it is because it is irritating to me when hams prattle
> this 375 watt stuff off as if it is just this trivial little thing
> like getting inside out of the rain.   I am accustomed to getting the
> 375 watt baloney from slopbucket operators but I am surprised to see
> it here.   Even if you try to do something reasonably accurate like
> measure your RF current into a measured 50 ohm load, your current for
> 375 watts is 2.7386 amps or something and try getting that nailed down
> with a 3 or 5 amp RF amp meter.   So it is all ludicrous to me and I
> therefore give it all the attention it deserves.
>
> 73
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.901 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3712 - Release Date: 06/18/11 
11:34:00 