[AMRadio] Broadcast Processors

[Nigel Holmes]

Radio Australia's Harris SW-100A transmitters at Shepparton used MBL-100 processors from 1993-2010. They were replaced with Orban 9300 processors. About a dozen MBL-100 went into the Australian surplus market. Haven't heard of any turning on the amateur bands.

They are excellent processors, but not for the likes of a BC-610 or 300G. They like to be mounted in the transmitters (leads < 6'). The transmitter "Frequency response must be less than 3dB down at 0.15Hz, and less than 0.1dB down at 9.5 kHz." !! Then the antenna needs to be flat as well.

If you find a CRL or Orban processor then use it as an excuse to build a dc-coupled PWM tx and a 160m antenna that is flat +/- 20 kHz about the operating frequency. The results will be stunning.

73 Nigel VK3DZ

-----Original Message-----
From: amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of W2XJ
Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2011 6:02 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Source Broadcast Xmtrs

The MBL-1 was targeted to shortwave broadcasting. I put the beta on a modified Marconi 250 Kw transmitter owned by the BBC. It had some very aggressive tilt and overshoot compensation capability. It could be made to be very loud. It also had an adjustment to keep low frequencies out of the clipper. The one important feature was that it moved any audio frequency shaping to the limiter's input. The transmitter would ideally be flat from below 1 hertz to at least 3 times the upper input frequency.

Two other hot boxes are the Orban shortwave Optimod (there has to be a ton of those surplus)and the hard to find Gregg Labs processor.

On 6/13/11 3:48 PM, Dennis Gilliam wrote:
> Indeed, and CRL was made just down the street from the station I 
> retired from.  They made a great limiter for AM, and never forget the 
> DAP-310 from KO6NM, either.
>
> 73DG
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:39 PM, W2XJ<w2xj at nyc.rr.com>  wrote:
>
>> Good low frequency response is important if broadcast style 
>> processing is used. The major name processors from the 80s and on 
>> used LF compensation to adjust tilt on clipped peaks and increased to 
>> amount of usable modulation. Those equalizers were designed to match 
>> the typical plate mod transmitters around at the time which went down 
>> to somewhere between 30 and 50 hertz. A 300 hertz cut off is far from 
>> adequate when a good processor is used before the transmitters.  If 
>> you want a screaming processor, try to find a CRL MBL-1.
>>
>> On 6/13/11 2:47 PM, Dennis Gilliam wrote:

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or copyright material.   It is intended only for
the use of the addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient of this
email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or
any attachments.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete this email from your system.  The ABC does not
represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free.   Before
opening any attachment you should check for viruses.  The ABC's liability is
limited to resupplying any email and attachments.