[AMRadio] Boat Anchor Receiver

[Bob Macklin]

Since the Ranger is an AM/CW transmitter many were used with GC receivers. 
Most of the better GC receivers has good enough stability for "OLD BUZZARD" 
AM activity and good enough CW stability for short term CW work.

It partially depends on how you want to use the Ranger.

I have been thinking about getting a ranger to use with my NC-109.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa.
"Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry Armstrong" <odtrainer at aol.com>
To: <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Boat Anchor Receiver


> Ho Todd,
>
>
> It's clear folks have their favorite and not so favorite receivers.  If I 
> am not careful I could but a tuck load of them, but I really only have 
> room for one and I am trying to get it pretty close to what I remember 
> back then.  I think I'll check the various online museums.
>
>
> Terry
> K0IEO
>
>
> Terry R. Armstrong
> 2445 Riverside Dr. #302
> Trenton, MI 48183
>
> odtrainer at aol.com
> Cell 734-778-3008
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd, KA1KAQ <ka1kaq at gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
> <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tue, Dec 20, 2011 7:51 am
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Boat Anchor Receiver
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:43 AM,  <manualman at juno.com> wrote:
>> Definitely one of the more silly and "makes no sense" type discussions.
>> Sort of like asking, what's the best car color to get to match my house
>> style.
>
> I can understand it from a hysterical....erm.....historical
> perspective. If trying to create a period station to enjoy as someone
> did 50 years ago is the goal, it's simple, since Johnson didn't make
> receivers: check available receivers of the day for price/performance,
> then cross reference the results against old CQ and QST photos. This
> will show what was available as well as what Ranger users preferred or
> could afford.
>
> Asking online will result in as many receiver suggestions as were
> available then, given enough response time. Pretty much everyone will
> have an opinion of what's "correct".
>
> ~ Todd,  KA1KAQ/4
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html